This makes good sense to me.
On Sun, 17 Feb 2019, at 11:54 PM, Joel H. wrote: > Linking roads should (generally speaking) never have names, an update to the > ID editor now displays Destination instead of name for input. My suggestion > would be to change the Offramp prefixes to: > destination= The places mentioned on the exit sign > destination:street= The road name that is at the end > destination:ref= The road ref that is at the end > destination:network= Only if destination road has a network tag. > This is what I've been doing, What does everyone think? > > On 12/2/19 5:22 pm, Petra Rajka - (p) wrote: >> Hi, >> >> During our mapping in Australia we’ve discovered that several road links >> have name. Usually there are 3 cases: >> 1. links take name from the upcoming road with the extra >> Onramp/Offramp/Exit prefix >> ex. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/4972970 >> 1. links take name from the upcoming road exactly as it is >> ex. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/15958927 >> 1. links (or other way categories) between dual carriageways take the >> name from one of the adjacent roads >> ex. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/172829556 >> >> In our mapping process we use this wiki page: >> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_link where it’s specified that >> links shouldn’t have name, so we are wondering if there are any local >> rules/conventions regarding this in Australia? Should the links have name? >> It’s a particularity we didn’t found until now. >> >> Best regards, >> Petra >> >> >> _______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list >> Talk-au@openstreetmap.org >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au >> > _______________________________________________ > Talk-au mailing list > Talk-au@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au >
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
