I guess https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access does say "Access values describe legal permissions/restrictions. What happens on the ground may be different: for instance, many footpaths are used as de facto bike paths, without a legal right to do so. (Various 'greyzone' tags have been proposed to deal with such situations, but this is controversial and is not described here.)"
Similar to existing "maxspeed:advisory" https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:maxspeed:advisory perhaps if these aren't legal restrictions but still signposted on the ground we could use "motor_vehicle:advisory=destination". Does that work better? On Fri, 8 Nov 2019 at 13:04, Luke Stewart <suburbansilvervl...@gmail.com> wrote: > As far as I have read, these signs are not enforceable by councils, nor do > they appear in the NSW (or Australian) Road Rules. So unless the road > itself is on private property and this sign is present, the access would > still be public and it has the same meaning as discouraging the use of the > street in favour of main roads. > _______________________________________________ > Talk-au mailing list > Talk-au@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au >
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
