Perhaps "motor_vehicle=discouraged"? >From the wiki: A legal right of way exists (see yes <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:access%3Dyes>) but usage is officially discouraged (e.g., HGVs on narrow but passable lanes). Only if marked by a traffic sign (subjective otherwise).
Although that may be getting too far away from the meaning of the sign, but the original intention is to discourage through and non-local traffic On Fri, 8 Nov 2019 at 15:31, Andrew Harvey <andrew.harv...@gmail.com> wrote: > I guess https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access does say "Access > values describe legal permissions/restrictions. What happens on the ground > may be different: for instance, many footpaths are used as de facto bike > paths, without a legal right to do so. (Various 'greyzone' tags have been > proposed to deal with such situations, but this is controversial and is not > described here.)" > > Similar to existing "maxspeed:advisory" > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:maxspeed:advisory perhaps if > these aren't legal restrictions but still signposted on the ground we could > use "motor_vehicle:advisory=destination". Does that work better? > > On Fri, 8 Nov 2019 at 13:04, Luke Stewart <suburbansilvervl...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> As far as I have read, these signs are not enforceable by councils, nor >> do they appear in the NSW (or Australian) Road Rules. So unless the road >> itself is on private property and this sign is present, the access would >> still be public and it has the same meaning as discouraging the use of the >> street in favour of main roads. >> _______________________________________________ >> Talk-au mailing list >> Talk-au@openstreetmap.org >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au >> >
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
