https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:boundary%3Dpostal_code indicates post code areas should be type=boundary + boundary=postal_code + postal_code=* on a relation or way. Given we don't have a good open data set for postal code boundaries, it's hard to map these anyway. They probably don't need an admin_level at all.
I think the other two we have 6 for LGA and 10 for Suburb/Localities are well used already and reasonable and what's being proposed for the PSMA import. On Wed, 16 Sep 2020 at 22:34, Ewen Hill <ewen.h...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thank you Andrew H for your un-waivering (sic) efforts and changing the > entire way the Australian map is developing. Chapeau! > > Andrew's last message in part, discussed how the admin_levels are defined > as and prompted for some suggestions, namely level 9 and 10 and if we > should include electoral boundaries. > > I have set up a quick spreadsheet outlining the admin_levels and I think I > have transcribed Andrew's thoughts on how it may work and added mine. > > Feel free to add your preferred layout in the next available col and add a > comment if you wish. > > > https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1dzOJoOL6sVLinzqZDcC2wOj-e_2BNz5QFkI-xGnpJXI/edit?usp=sharing > > -- > Ewen > _______________________________________________ > Talk-au mailing list > Talk-au@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au >
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
