Nov 30, 2020, 13:10 by 61sundow...@gmail.com: > On 27/11/20 11:15 am, Andrew Hughes wrote: > >> This subject has a long-running chequered past that hasn't reached >> a conclusion >> >> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Tag:tunnel%3Dculvert#.22Tagging_controversy.22_section >> >> From my understanding, the convention is to tag the water course >> (i.e. river/stream/creek) as tunnel=culvert. It's great as it >> models where water traverses man made structures and I can see it >> helping many scenarios. However, it doesn't help with road usage. >> >> We need to model/tag the culvert as part of the road infrastructure. >> > > > > > Would a node that connects both road and water way be sufficient? > > That would break current tagging methods that do not merge in one node vertically separated objects like culvert pipe under road or river under bridge or road under road on a viaduct. node shared by waterway and road is for fords
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
