"Where something like the boundaries of a State Park and a forested area are not the same."
I'd say that this is common and expected, and should be handled with separate areas. I feel it's very much the old style of mapping to put 'natural=wood' on a park admin boundary. Adam On Fri, 8 Oct 2021 at 08:38, <fors...@ozonline.com.au> wrote: > Hi > If you were told this by changeset comment, can you give the URL? > Tony > > > Hi everyone > > I am a basic OSM editor. I usually just correct obvious map errors I find > > while hiking/cycling. I have tried to be a little more ambitious every > now > > and then, but I have found it can be quite difficult to keep other > editors > > happy with what I do. > > > > My question is: Can you have overlapping 'areas'? I was told by someone > in > > this group that you can't. > > > > For example; Where something like the boundaries of a State Park and a > > forested area are not the same. This is the issue where I was told that > you > > can't do that. > > This makes no logical sense to me as this happens all the time. > > > > I would appreciate some guidance on this issue. > > Kind regards > > Andrew Parker > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-au mailing list > Talk-au@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au >
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
