Hi Folks,
I think Class 1 specifically mentions disability access so I would hate to see that combined in any way with other classes. Cheers - Phil From: Graeme Fitzpatrick <graemefi...@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, 31 January 2022 2:23 PM To: ianst...@iinet.net.au Cc: OSM-Au <talk-au@openstreetmap.org> Subject: Re: [talk-au] sac_scale [Was: Deletion of walking On Mon, 31 Jan 2022 at 11:05, <ianst...@iinet.net.au <mailto:ianst...@iinet.net.au> > wrote: I think we should just stick with the AWTGS as it stands. It seems to be gaining widespread government support, and even if it is not perfect, it seems like a standard that is going to stay with us. So, working on this idea, looking at https://www.ffm.vic.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0019/21475/dse_trail_grade_brochure_tagged.pdf, & having a play, a first draft comes up with something like: AWGTS Class 1 Criteria OSM Distance Xxx (<5k) Distance=4.5 Gradient Flat incline=no steps=no Quality Well formed surface=paved / compacted Wheelchair OK wheelchair=yes Markings Sign-posted trail_visibility=excellent Time (closest 15 / 30 minutes / Duration=00:15 / 15 minutes Hour / half-day / day) Experience Nil All the rest slot rather well into existing tags, although "incline" may be a bit iffy?, but don't know what to do with the "Experience" field? The Guide says: Class 1 / 2 - "No experience required" Class 3 - "Some bushwalking experience recommended" Class 4 - "Experienced bushwalkers" Class 5 - "Very experienced bushwalkers" A new key perhaps: AWGTS_scale=1-5, with descriptions as above? What do you all think? Thanks Graeme
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
