Still no response from anybody here, so might throw it out to the Tagging list to see what people world-wide think?
Thanks Graeme On Wed, 9 Mar 2022 at 14:28, Graeme Fitzpatrick <graemefi...@gmail.com> wrote: > & it would have helped if I posted my original message, as I intended to! > :-( > > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/2022-February/015884.html > > As I said then, to me personally, looking at Brisbane CBD: > https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=14/-27.4701/153.0343, (but the other > major cities would be the same), the main grid of the busiest streets > should probably be Secondary with smaller streets as either Tertiary or > Minor / Unclass? > > One comment on the =secondary talk page pretty well agrees: > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Tag:highway%3Dsecondary > > I'm amazed though that there appears never to have been any discussion on > this previously? > > Just looking at other major cities, most of them seem to be a mix of > primary & tertiary, with only a few secondary, except for Manhattan, NY, > which has lots of both primary & secondary with not that many tertiary. > > Thanks > > Graeme > > > On Wed, 9 Mar 2022 at 14:14, Andrew Davidson <thesw...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 12:45 PM Graeme Fitzpatrick >> <graemefi...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > Brought that same question up a little while back, but no response. >> >> Ah yes, sorry about that. My interest in highway classification is so >> low I don't think your email even registered with me. >> >> Had a read through the wiki on highway classification and it is pretty >> useless for deciding what to do in urban areas. >> >> Anyway let's give a week or so and then we can close that issue with a >> note that nobody has an opinion on the subject. >> >
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
