Thanks for raising the issue, Graeme.

I opened the issue but I have limited understanding of what an easement is in different jurisdiction.

Ben makes a good point in that an easement can be considered as an absence of something else, so might not need to be mapped, more specifically a space in between plots that can be built. Maybe why there is so little of it mapped on OSM?

Where the note points, I believe the reason it exists is access to the small bit of bushland and the creek, for emergency services for example. In that case, should it be tagged as a track rather than a footway? And what access tag should be used?

Cheers

On 18/3/22 15:29, Benjamin Ceravolo wrote:
If there is no formed track (but vehicles do use it) then I would think that highway=track or path, surface=grass, visibility=no, low, etc. and access=private, otherwise landcover=grass would be fine in my opinion. OSM is not a town planning serves it, it does not contain zoning codes or laws so why should it contain easements? Further to this, easements are a lack of ground structure (due to an underground, overground, or planned utility/road), therefore not having anything mapped on top of them would not cause a problem (and the eagle eyed may think there is an easement there)

Ben

On Fri, 18 Mar 2022 at 10:58, Graeme Fitzpatrick <graemefi...@gmail.com> wrote:

    A note had been raised concerning mapping a Council access easement:
    https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2883145#map=19/-27.50901/153.03017

    Suggestion was made that these should be leisure=nature_reserve as
    it is not to be developed on?

    I suggested that they're just highway=footway + surface=grass,
    possibly with access=private if so signposted e.g:
    https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/538670878

    Alternative suggestion was landuse=easement?

    Have just done some searching &, strangely, there are basically no
    easements in OSM!
    https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=easement

    The 13 "easements" are all in Australia for gas pipelines:
    https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1gXr,
    while the 28 "easement_filed" are all in Florida for power lines:
    https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1gXs

    The only other mentions of easements are in the wiki for US Public
    Lands:
    https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_States/Public_lands,
    together with a brief mention in Massachusetts:
    https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Massachusetts/Conservation

    So, how would we like to map these areas?

    3 alternatives would seem to be nature_reserve / landuse or highway?

    Any other suggestions / thoughts?

    What do we all think?

    Thanks

    Graeme
    _______________________________________________
    Talk-au mailing list
    Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
    https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


_______________________________________________
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au

--
Stéphane Guillou
http://stragu.gitlab.io/

You can encrypt our communications by using OpenPGP. My public key 4E211060 is 
available on the keys.gnupg.net server.

Other ways to interact with me are listed on my contact 
page:http://stragu.gitlab.io/contact/
_______________________________________________
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au

Reply via email to