Hi all
Up to now I have only questioned Sebastian (HighRouleur) on his
information sources and reasoning on the use of access=destination
First going to the wiki: "Transit traffic forbidden, all non-transit
traffic to a given element allowed."
But I am aware that the wiki does not trump common OSM usage so I
would like to check with the community.
It seems that its a nonsense to use access=destination on roads that
have no connection to the rest of the world, how can you forbid what
is impossible. Likewise its a nonsense for where there is one point of
connection. Should the destination tag be removed from all these?
Zero connections to the world
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/164040247
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/164040219
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/148171270
one entrance
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/632504904
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/551195212
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/563380640
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/48162492
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/176876122
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/117893671
Then there are networks that connect at two or more places to the
world but there is no restrictive signage. I would remove the
destination tag.
Two entrances and no signs
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/-37.99231/145.14903
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/118193819
Then there are networks that are clearly signed indicating Transit
traffic is forbidden. These are the only places I would use the
access=destination tag.
Have I got it right? Right enough to revert any tagging that does not conform?
Thanks Tony
_______________________________________________
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
