On Mon, 21 Mar 2022 at 10:22, <fors...@ozonline.com.au> wrote: > Then there are networks that are clearly signed indicating Transit > traffic is forbidden. These are the only places I would use the > access=destination tag. > > Have I got it right? Right enough to revert any tagging that does not > conform? >
See also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines#Local_Traffic_Only and the linked discussion thread. Those example changesets look questionable to me, but I don't have the local knowledge. Private property open to the public is more "access=permissive". access=destination really should only be for something signed as not allowing through traffic. I'd suggest adding a changeset comment to invite them here to discuss further, if you don't hear back then I think it's reasonable to revert.
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
