Hi Andy,
I am aware of the volunteers doing this great work. My concern was that I had not received a confirmation that the email had been received and a ticket created. This has happened once before and I was led to believe the ticket creation to be automatic on receiving an email. If its not an automatic process then please accept my apologies and I will make a suggestion that an autoresponder is installed so that we at least know that the email has arrived at the correct location. Is the correct email address d...@openstreetmap.org <mailto:d...@openstreetmap.org> or is it d...@otrs.openstreetmap.org <mailto:d...@otrs.openstreetmap.org> which others seemed to have used. Cheers - Phil From: Andy Townsend <ajt1...@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, 4 April 2022 6:26 PM To: talk-au@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [talk-au] Map Note Flood Hello, Andy from OSM's Data Working Group here. > Is there any other way to alert the Data working group? With respect, which part of "Please understand that our working group consists of volunteers only who do this job in their spare time. All incoming messages are read but processing them can take a little time." (in the acknowledgement that gets sent out to every DWG ticket) was unclear? We got Phil's message 6:51 UTC Saturday morning. The user was blocked in https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5875 about 49 hours later, across a weekend. Is that response not snappy enough for you? :) With regard to the data that they've added, we'll give them a few days to respond to the questions that they have been asked and if we don't hear anything we'll revert and then likely redact the data. With regard to the original notes, looking at the country feeds such as https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-notes-country?c=Australia , https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-notes-country?c=United%20States and https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-notes-country?c=Canada it seems that most or all of the original notes have been closed and will disappear from the map in a few days. I'm aware that there are "note cleanup" projects going on in Australia and elsewhere, so hopefully any stragglers will also get dealt with. Best Regards, Andy On 04/04/2022 04:28, Phil Wyatt wrote: Another 60 changesets this morning! Is there any other way to alert the Data working group? I suspect there will be over 400 changesets to revert and they will get harder the longer he adds data. Cheers From: Phil Wyatt <mailto:p...@wyatt-family.com> <p...@wyatt-family.com> Sent: Monday, 4 April 2022 10:29 AM To: 'Graeme Fitzpatrick' <mailto:graemefi...@gmail.com> <graemefi...@gmail.com>; 'Andrew Davidson' <mailto:thesw...@gmail.com> <thesw...@gmail.com>; 'OSM - Andrew Harvey' <mailto:andrew.harv...@gmail.com> <andrew.harv...@gmail.com> Cc: 'OpenStreetMap' <mailto:talk-au@openstreetmap.org> <talk-au@openstreetmap.org> Subject: Re: [talk-au] Map Note Flood Hi Folks, Can someone else please log a request to the Data Working Group re this user. I suspect me email is not getting to them as I have not even received an acknowledgement as yet (which I gather should be instantaneous) He is still working away adding road names Changesets in Australia by PopeyePopcord <mailto:d...@openstreetmap.org> d...@openstreetmap.org suggested reverts 119223580 119223590 119223592 119223605 119223620 119223637 119223650 119223659 119223666 119223674 119223683 119223719 119223741 119223758 119223766 119223781 119223790 119223806 119223819 119224021 119224028 119224065 119224109 119224938 - maybe dont revert this - SWAVU comment 119225009 119225018 119244811 119244940 119247805 119247832 119247850 119247892 119247910 119247919 119247973 119248033 119248057 119248118 119248169 119248239 119248274 119248322 119248753 119248767 119248789 119248810 119248822 119248862 119248914 119248959 119249026 119249073 119249093 119249135 119249266 119250024 119276663 119276678 119276773 119276793 119276824 119276841 119276875 119276933 119276992 119277068 119277105 119277136 119277169 119277230 119277248 119277257 119277364 119277377 119277756 119277793 119277821 119277902 119277945 119277971 119278013 119278024 119278060 119278075 119278139 119278155 119278198 119278239 119278334 119278421 119278439 119278464 Cheers - Phil From: Phil Wyatt < <mailto:p...@wyatt-family.com> p...@wyatt-family.com> Sent: Sunday, 3 April 2022 12:32 PM To: 'Graeme Fitzpatrick' < <mailto:graemefi...@gmail.com> graemefi...@gmail.com>; 'Andrew Davidson' < <mailto:thesw...@gmail.com> thesw...@gmail.com>; 'OSM - Andrew Harvey' < <mailto:andrew.harv...@gmail.com> andrew.harv...@gmail.com> Cc: 'OpenStreetMap' < <mailto:talk-au@openstreetmap.org> talk-au@openstreetmap.org> Subject: Re: [talk-au] Map Note Flood Hi Folks, He is back at it in Australia, mainly in aboriginal communities – adding street names and population and still no response for any changeset comments. I am collecting all the changeset numbers but no response from the data working group as yet Cheers - Phil From: Graeme Fitzpatrick < <mailto:graemefi...@gmail.com> graemefi...@gmail.com> Sent: Saturday, 2 April 2022 4:52 PM To: Andrew Davidson < <mailto:thesw...@gmail.com> thesw...@gmail.com>; OSM - Andrew Harvey < <mailto:andrew.harv...@gmail.com> andrew.harv...@gmail.com> Cc: OpenStreetMap < <mailto:talk-au@openstreetmap.org> talk-au@openstreetmap.org> Subject: Re: [talk-au] Map Note Flood Looks like we have somebody playing games? https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3111672#map=15/-12.5048/135.8049 https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/PopeyePopcord https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/PopeyePopcord/history#map=6/-18.272/136.714 AndrewH - you may need to swap to DWG hat for a moment? Thanks Graeme On Thu, 31 Mar 2022 at 15:39, Graeme Fitzpatrick <graemefi...@gmail.com <mailto:graemefi...@gmail.com> > wrote: Just had a comment made by somebody in the US on one of the Notes I worked on: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3111658 Apparently copying from HERE.com They have referred to DWG. Thanks Graeme On Thu, 31 Mar 2022 at 11:50, Andrew Davidson <thesw...@gmail.com <mailto:thesw...@gmail.com> > wrote: > On looking at the notes added in Australia, they do seem to be an automated > script comparing what’s in OSM to an external source. > > The notes added to Nhulunbuy, Groote Eylandt and Maningrida don’t seem to be > coming from a suitable NT give source. One of the notes suggests a street > name for a road I was only able to find in Google Maps. > That's the weird bit. They seem to be a mix of stuff from Google Maps and completely fictional stuff. Maningrida as far as I can tell doesn't have street names. _______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org <mailto:Talk-au@openstreetmap.org> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au _______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org <mailto:Talk-au@openstreetmap.org> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au