Hi Guys, Thanks for the quick responses!
Andrew Harvey: traffic_sign=AU:R6-22,G9-83 seems better than traffic_sign=AU:R6-22;AU:G9-83 but I can see why you say both would be valid. Q: Let's say there is also another sign "Zombies Ahead" that doesn't have a NTC code at the same location. Would that be separated with a semi-colon? and tagged as.... traffic_sign=AU:R6-22,G9-83;Zombies Ahead Graeme, ideally the "7km" is recorded in the tagging... mostly because some juro's do this so they don't need to place "end of .... signage". But on that subject.... Q: lots of signage such as G9-82 (see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Road_signs_in_Australia ) also includes the % slope. This is perhaps similar to the "7km" supplementary information on the sign and perhaps the same convention could apply to both. For example https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=-35.05425945999999&lng=138.53492903000006&z=19.9&trafficSign%5B%5D=all&mapStyle=OpenStreetMap&pKey=798881551059257&focus=photo&x=0.49105747415321865&y=0.5517154385592334&zoom=0 Cheers, Andrew On Wed, 8 Feb 2023 at 14:46, Graeme Fitzpatrick <graemefi...@gmail.com> wrote: > Does it need the "7k" in there as well? > > Thanks > > Graeme > > > On Wed, 8 Feb 2023 at 13:54, Andrew Harvey <andrew.harv...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> >> >> On Wed, 8 Feb 2023 at 12:44, Andrew Hughes <ahhug...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> Looking good. Given... >>> >>> Node: traffic_sign=AU:R6-22 >>> https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3227568911 >>> >>> Way: low_gears:hgv=designated >>> https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/245284221 >>> >>> Question: >>> >>> The tagging of the way.... does not use the AU:R6-22 (signage) code. >>> Can anyone elaborate on why this is? They seem like conflicting tagging >>> schemes. >>> >> >> You can if you like >> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:traffic_sign#On_a_way_or_area. >> >> One is tagging the exact sign (which is specific to Australia), the other >> is tagging the restriction which the sign creates on the way (which could >> apply globally). >> >> Would someone be able to review this tagging... >>> https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/132233374 >> >> >> That looks okay. The wiki does say >> >> In case of multiple signs separated by commas or semicolons, the prefix >> should appear only once at the beginning (except if signs from different >> prefixes are combined). >> >> Which would be traffic_sign=AU:R6-22,G9-83 >> >> but how you have it should also be acceptable. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Talk-au mailing list >> Talk-au@openstreetmap.org >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au >> >
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
