On 8/2/23 16:07, Andrew Hughes wrote:
Hi Guys,
Thanks for the quick responses!
Andrew Harvey: traffic_sign=AU:R6-22,G9-83 seems better than
traffic_sign=AU:R6-22;AU:G9-83 but I can see why you say both would
be valid.
Q: Let's say there is also another sign "Zombies Ahead" that doesn't
have a NTC code at the same location. Would that be separated with a
semi-colon? and tagged as.... traffic_sign=AU:R6-22,G9-83;Zombies Ahead
Graeme, ideally the "7km" is recorded in the tagging... mostly because
some juro's do this so they don't need to place "end of .... signage".
But on that subject....
Q: lots of signage such as G9-82 (see
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Road_signs_in_Australia ) also includes
the % slope. This is perhaps similar to the "7km" supplementary
information on the sign and perhaps the same convention could apply to
both. For example
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=-35.05425945999999&lng=138.53492903000006&z=19.9&trafficSign%5B%5D=all&mapStyle=OpenStreetMap&pKey=798881551059257&focus=photo&x=0.49105747415321865&y=0.5517154385592334&zoom=0
<https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=-35.05425945999999&lng=138.53492903000006&z=19.9&trafficSign%5B%5D=all&mapStyle=OpenStreetMap&pKey=798881551059257&focus=photo&x=0.49105747415321865&y=0.5517154385592334&zoom=0>
The '% slope' would be the key 'incline' that can simply be applied to
the road way.
_______________________________________________
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
