Hi folks, just checking to make sure I'm not missing something here... There's a large relation called 'Murray River' which covers all of Lake Hume, plus an upstream section of the Murray. This is a natural=water 'riverbank' relation, not a waterway relation.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8327459#map=11/-36.1129/147.3280 There's also another, nearly identical, relation called 'Lake Hume' that covers Lake Hume only. This only covers the lake, not the river upstream, and looks fine. https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1531635#map=11/-36.0960/147.2417 Are there any objections if I severely truncate the Murray River relation so it excludes Lake Hume, and includes only the river upstream of Lake Hume, where it will join the eastern edge of the Lake Hume relation? The southern arm of Lake Hume is fed by the Mitta Mitta not the Murray, so calling the entire lake the Murray River is problematic. Again, this relation covers the boundary of the lake, not the central waterway. Anything I'm missing here? Thanks again, Ian
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
