Jo wrote: > What follows are the reactions of 2 people on talk-be, regarding my > question. I know Ivodeb is not happy with how I tried to solve the marriage > between proper rendering of normal maps and maps of bus routes. We'd need a > separate tag for indicating that these 'roads' are not actually there, but > they are more like 'virtual pathways' of where the vehicles are likely to > travel across such a wide road, devoid of lanes.
Whenever I encounter a "virtual path" for for example a cycle route or a walking route crossing a big pedestrian square, I draw an extra way, with just the tag "route=bicycle" or "route=foot" (no highway tags) which shows how you'd walk or drive over it, and I add that way to the relation. > Please let me know what you think. Ivodeb would also like to see two oneway > streets between the platforms, but there too, there is only a wide slab of > concrete. I could add them to the multipolygon, ofc, but that's completely > breaking with how OSM used to map. Maybe it's the way to go, though. Not sure if I understand this situation correctly, but if there is no division between the two directions, then it should be one way. Greetings Ben _______________________________________________ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
