2010/10/7 Ben Laenen <benlae...@gmail.com> > Jo wrote: > > What follows are the reactions of 2 people on talk-be, regarding my > > question. I know Ivodeb is not happy with how I tried to solve the > marriage > > between proper rendering of normal maps and maps of bus routes. We'd need > a > > separate tag for indicating that these 'roads' are not actually there, > but > > they are more like 'virtual pathways' of where the vehicles are likely to > > travel across such a wide road, devoid of lanes. > > Whenever I encounter a "virtual path" for for example a cycle route or a > walking route crossing a big pedestrian square, I draw an extra way, with > just > the tag "route=bicycle" or "route=foot" (no highway tags) which shows how > you'd walk or drive over it, and I add that way to the relation. > > > > Please let me know what you think. Ivodeb would also like to see two > oneway > > streets between the platforms, but there too, there is only a wide slab > of > > concrete. I could add them to the multipolygon, ofc, but that's > completely > > breaking with how OSM used to map. Maybe it's the way to go, though. > > Not sure if I understand this situation correctly, but if there is no > division > between the two directions, then it should be one way. > > Greetings > Ben >
Please have a look at that last sentence again. I don't think it says what you wanted it to say. Removing the highway tags may well be the solution I was looking for. Could you have a look at the actual link? It became a real 'work of art' :-) http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=50.882181&lon=4.714964&zoom=18&layers=M Thanks, Jo
_______________________________________________ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
