On Wednesday 31 August 2011 16:09:54 Gerard Vanderveken wrote: > That is OK for JOSM, but a list like this (at the bottom) is simply not > meaningful. > http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/9175555?relation_page=3
Then go complain to whoever is in charge of how that page is rendered? > This is much clearer. > http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/9132576 > altough a short name would also do: > http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1641610 > The route name is not 'invented', everyone referr to it as the route > from node A to node B > So why not formalize it? Because it's not its name. And because suddenly renderers have no idea whether they should render the name of a route or not. Or will you also invent another tag like 'show_name=no'? Keep the database clean and don't sacrifice correct data for a little bit of legibility on a random webpage that for all we know may soon support showing the note tag. Greetings Ben _______________________________________________ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
