> That is OK for JOSM, but a list like this (at the bottom) is simply not > meaningful. > http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/9175555?relation_page=3 > This is much clearer.
Then ask for that page to display a note=* tag when a name=* is absent, like JOSM does. But why would you start making collection relations when a scheme already exists? See here: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cycle_Node_Network_Tagging Which as far as I can see meets your needs and relations conforming to that scheme have been in the database for over a year. -- Lennard _______________________________________________ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
