I made my proposals on the talk page: it may be easier...
Should we organize vote ?
Julien
Le 11/10/12 14:53, eMerzh a écrit :
about the bylaws published i have some comments but should i set them
on the wiki (discussion? ) or here?
like the "Object de l'assoc.. " (art 3.1 ) .. we need to be more OSM specific .
I like the opendata mouvement but OSM-belgium is about OSM ..; if we
can in the process give access to other opendata , great!
We may look on the French version to have good idea ...
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_France/Projet_d%27association_en_France/Statuts
There, the object is :
L’objectif de l’association est de promouvoir le projet OpenStreetMap
et notamment la collecte, la diffusion et l'utilisation de données
cartographiques sous des licences libres. Le règlement intérieur liste
les licences libres applicables aux données géographiques
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 2:42 PM, Julien Fastré <jul...@fastre.info> wrote:
Ok. +1 for me.
Until now, we have never heard on this list the proposal to have 2
organisations.
Thinking about that, I was imagined also a possibility to have two
organisations with a representation of the other one in the board of each
one... But for thoses people, it means having to keep beeing up to date of
two asbl/vzw...
about the question: "what to do in this asbl" and "what to do with the
money", i thought about such things:
- organising some mapping parties and events and communicate about it (to
let know OSM) ;
- let do some research by universities about open data, or ask them to make
a review of licence we will maybe discuss with administration ;
- be present at some places (REWICS in Wallonia, salon des enseignants (?),
...) ;
- and do a lot of lobbying in favour of osm by municipalities,
administrations, etc.
- ...
About the bylaws published yesterday : do you agree about the proposals ?
For me, we should have only two category of members :
- membres adhérents : all contributors who may justify to be registered on
OSM since two months ;
- membres effectifs : members accepted by the board (this is the case in the
french association) ;
I do not see the utility of honoured members and "membres bienfaiteurs"
Of course, other organisation personnes morales are accepted as members.
Julien
Le 11/10/12 14:08, Jo a écrit :
My vote goes to 1 organisation (until we split the country, lol, just
kidding). I don't see a problem with only having the bylaws in 1 language,
even if it is French :-).
Jo
2012/10/11 eMerzh <merz...@gmail.com>
I can help too... (i live in brussels)
The first thing to choose is if we do 2 or 1 organisation (with maybe
regional points)
Then we need to discuss the object of the association ...
and i think we need to become a real "local chapter" to be able to use
osm logo / ...
_______________________________________________
Talk-be mailing list
Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
_______________________________________________
Talk-be mailing list
Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
_______________________________________________
Talk-be mailing list
Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
_______________________________________________
Talk-be mailing list
Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
_______________________________________________
Talk-be mailing list
Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
