2012/11/11 A.Pirard.Papou <a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com> > On 2012-11-08 16:46, Ben Laenen wrote : > > On Thursday 08 November 2012 16:34:23 Sander Deryckere wrote: > > As administrative boundaries should be nested nicely, I propose to delete > the boundary 2436189, and to use the municipalities of the Arrondissement > of Verviers as subareas. Just as with any other arrondissement. > > Boundaries don't need to be nested. In our country it's impossible to do > so anyway. > > What do you mean? > That there should be a single relation called Belgium or that all ways > should be at level 8? > > Cheers, > > André. >
Ben probably means that there should be no "subarea" relations. but those just make it so easy to browse through on the site. If you just go to a random relation (like http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1292925), you can see what is below it, and of what it's part. For me, it makes it very easy to check boundaries, or to browse boundaries. That's why I add the subareas, but not adding them is not wrong. Regards, Sander
_______________________________________________ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
