On Sunday 11 November 2012 01:39:57 A.Pirard.Papou wrote: > On 2012-11-08 16:46, Ben Laenen wrote : > > On Thursday 08 November 2012 16:34:23 Sander Deryckere wrote: > >> As administrative boundaries should be nested nicely, I propose to > >> delete the boundary 2436189, and to use the municipalities of the > >> Arrondissement of Verviers as subareas. Just as with any other > >> arrondissement. > > > > Boundaries don't need to be nested. In our country it's impossible to > > do so anyway. > > What do you mean? > That there should be a single relation called Belgium or that all ways > should be at level 8?
I mean that (for example) there's really no problem if two enitities of the same admin_level overlap a certain area (so that area belongs two both entities). E.g. Brussels belonging to both Flemish and French Community. Or if an entity with admin_level=8 doesn't sit nicely inside an entity with admin_level=6. E.g. German speaking community being part of the Liege province. Or French community not spanning the entire Liege province. Ben _______________________________________________ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
