Er werd toen gesuggereerd dat programmeurs mogelijkheden genoeg hebben om vast te stellen dat de weg doodloopt (voor bepaalde voertuigen)
Guy Vanvuchelen Van: Marc Gemis [mailto:marc.ge...@gmail.com] Verzonden: vrijdag 4 april 2014 9:37 Aan: OpenStreetMap Belgium Onderwerp: Re: [OSM-talk-be] Fwd: [Tagging] noexit=yes on ways ? jouw gebruik is inderdaad wat ze nu op de Duitse wiki beschrijven. De Engelse zou nog beschrijven dat het ook op wegen kan. On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 9:02 AM, Guy Vanvuchelen <guy.vanvuche...@gmail.com> wrote: Enkele maanden geleden is dit onderwerp ook op het forum verschenen. Toen had ik begrepen dat het enkel op nodes mocht. Sindsdien gebruik ik het om aan te duiden dat twee wegen die kort bij mekaar eindigen maar gescheiden zijn door een gracht, heuvel, bomenrij, enz. niet op mekaar aansluiten. Guy Vanvuchelen Van: Marc Gemis [mailto:marc.ge...@gmail.com] Verzonden: vrijdag 4 april 2014 8:51 Aan: OpenStreetMap Belgium Onderwerp: [OSM-talk-be] Fwd: [Tagging] noexit=yes on ways ? >From the tagging mailing list and the German mailing list. The conclusion is that noexit should only be used on nodes and in case there is no way for any road user to continue. So it's not used when there is a no-exit sign with a cyclist/pedestrian on top If I recall correctly, this is different from what was discussed on this mailing list (tag can be placed on ways as well). Op de Duitse en tagging mailing lists werd er gediscussieerd over noexit. Het zou enkel mogen gebruikt worden op nodes en wanneer geen enkele weggebruiker verder kan. Dus niet bij een doodlopende straat met daarboven een fietser/voetganger. Ik denk dat dit anders is dan wat vroeger op deze lijst geschreven is (mag ook op wegen). regards m ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Florian Schäfer <flor...@schaeferban.de> Date: Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 9:50 PM Subject: Re: [Tagging] noexit=yes on ways ? To: tagg...@openstreetmap.org Hello, Am 03.04.2014 21:22, schrieb SomeoneElse: fly wrote: Is noexit=yes useful on ways ? Asking a slightly broader question, in what situations is "noexit=yes" useful at all, except as a cue to subsequent mappers in the very rare situation that one way ends very close to another one and there's absolutely nothing (not a wall, footpath, anything) between them? In the diskussion on the German ML, some users pointed out, that it is rendered on some (esp. outdoor-)maps to indicate, that the way really ends. Because otherwise one could think that the mapper who added this way has just entered the first part of the way and forgot to tag fixme=continue or something similar. And obviously there is the advantage for QA-tools to filter out false-positive unconnected-way-errors. By the way: I am the user who started the discussion on talk-de. And my intention was to define the usage of the tag more precisely and to point out, that there are currently situations, where this tag is used but where it makes no sense. For example it was used at entrances of buildings, because the way ends there of course (I oppose this usage). And the discussion showed, that it makes no sense there, because some people can always enter an entrance, so is not a deadend. Another conclusion from the discussion was, that noexit=yes should only be used where no person can travel further. For a more complete overview over the conclusions, see the german Wiki-page [1] (Google translate: [2]), which I've updated today with the insights from the discussion. Cheers, Florian [1]: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:noexit [2]: http://translate.google.com/translate?sl=de <http://translate.google.com/translate?sl=de&tl=en&js=y&prev=_t&hl=de&ie=UTF -8&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwiki.openstreetmap.org%2Fwiki%2FDE%3AKey%3Anoexit&edit-tex t=&act=url> &tl=en&js=y&prev=_t&hl=de&ie=UTF-8&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwiki.openstreetmap.org%2Fw iki%2FDE%3AKey%3Anoexit&edit-text=&act=url _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list tagg...@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging _______________________________________________ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
_______________________________________________ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
