On 2014-11-11 19:40, Glenn Plas wrote : > Andre, > > In case you look for more routers, try this one. It's very fast, I > consider it a light weight one. > > There still work to be done on it, not perfect but worth diving into it. > > http://www.routino.org > > Glenn > > On 11-11-14 19:16, Marc Gemis wrote: >> On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 2:40 PM, André Pirard <a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com >> <mailto:a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> Wonderful router you're showing. Does it use often updated data? >> >> >> I thought the routing data was updated daily, the map is updated more >> frequent. Remember that this router does not honor turn restrictions at >> this moment. In case you want to test that, you can >> use http://map.project-osrm.org/. >> >> I believe there is some beta code to integrate both routers into osm.org >> <http://osm.org>. >> >> regards >> >> m Oh yes, beside mobile Osmand, I appreciate Web routers much, thanks. My preference is YourNavigation - Worldwide routing on OpenStreetMap data <http://www.yournavigation.org/index.php> That gem supports Goods, Heavy goods, etc. See it. But not my "as the crow flies" and per stage transport type. Unfortunately, development stopped and map updates are seldom. Dev says he wants a computer but he did not reply to an e-mail.
I believe that this kind of routers is the only way for OSM routing to succeed. To stop being laughed at, even by contributors at themselves. But there shouldn't be too many (engines) used as follows. a) routing gurus make public recommendations to site dev in case of errors b) the wiki is improved for clarity in parallel c) mappers can check their doings and correct their mistakes or signal more software errors d) map users can file OSM Notes if they arrive at Chamonix instead of Saint-Tropez e) the word "fuzzy" is removed from OSM, at least for routing, that is. Cheers, André.
_______________________________________________ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
