On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 8:51 PM, Yves bxl-forever <bxl-fore...@linuxmail.org> wrote: > Despite Belgian traffic rules use the same word (fietspad - piste cyclable) > for a reserved track (with D7 or D9 signs) and for markings (two stripped > lines), in OSM-taal those could be tagged with cycleway=opposite_track and > cycleway=opposite_lane respectively. In Brussels, it is fairly common to > paint logos or inverted V-signs on the street but those have no legally > binding value a
I "hate" this opposite_xxx tag. IMHO, it is used incorrectly in most cases. oneway:bicycle=no + cycleway=track/lane is recommended, see e.g. M1 on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bicycle opposite_lane should only be used when there is a lane in the opposite direction of the one_way and there is no lane in the direction of the oneway. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:cycleway%3Dopposite_lane Or as indicated in the above M1, when you tag forward/backward separately. It is not enough to indicate a oneway street with cycle lanes in both directions. I have seen it even used when there are no lanes, i.e. the cyclists have to drive on the main road. So please do not recommend it's use. regards m. _______________________________________________ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
