Hi Bart, Is it the Aanlooproute that was deleted, or one of it's member paths? If it is the first, Jo's explanation above won't help you I'm afraid.
I do have some good (or bad, depending on how you look at it) new though. We are allowed to use the GPX files from Grote Routepaden to map these trails. Check this wiki page for an overview: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Belgium/Walking_Routes#GR_footpaths If you look up GR561 you'll see that no one has added the relation for the Aanlooproute you mention to the article. If someone would have done this, it would be much easier to see who had removed it and why. There are also UMAP instances for all main GR routes, which overlay OSM and official data, to help you spot errors. I tend to use those for mapping new routes too. In blue, the missing connection as mapped by Grote Routepaden: http://umap.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/gr561_98495#15/51.2255/5.4330 -- Joost Schouppe OpenStreetMap <http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/joost%20schouppe/> | Twitter <https://twitter.com/joostjakob> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/pub/joost-schouppe/48/939/603> | Meetup <http://www.meetup.com/OpenStreetMap-Belgium/members/97979802/>
_______________________________________________ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
