Hi Bart, This is also why we have the UMAPs. The idea is to mark bigger differences like that, and talk to the provincial GR responsibles about them. Without some curation like that, we'll never know who is really right, because the same often happens the other way around too. Check the GR12 umap to see what it looks like after checking.
2017-02-15 9:01 GMT+01:00 Bart Vanherck <vherckb...@gmail.com>: > Thanks for the links I will have a better look at it. > > I do not really trust the official gpx files. For example: the route in > Geel is different because the route has been changed a few years ago, but > the official gpx trace is still the old one. So I think we still need to > verify it on terrain. > > >> I do have some good (or bad, depending on how you look at it) new though. >> We are allowed to use the GPX files from Grote Routepaden to map these >> trails. >> >> >> > _______________________________________________ > Talk-be mailing list > Talk-be@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be > > -- Joost Schouppe OpenStreetMap <http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/joost%20schouppe/> | Twitter <https://twitter.com/joostjakob> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/pub/joost-schouppe/48/939/603> | Meetup <http://www.meetup.com/OpenStreetMap-Belgium/members/97979802/>
_______________________________________________ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
