For what i understand, the landuse=grass is mostly a "landcover=grass" tag
which was never properly named (and thus it is used like that). The
surface=grass alone doesn't mean much in OSM as the surface tag is (i
think) only a secondary tag (adding information to other object like
highway=* ).

For the original question, it seems indeed to be less accepted to connect
the landuse to the highway! And i find that it is so much easier to edit
when it is not connected to the highway (or to the landuse on the other
side) as it can just be directly moved without splitting first. If you want
to map the area of an highway there is the proposal of tag "area:highway=*"
that can be used but is not rendered at the moment (see here :
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Street_area). But it
could in the future if the usage become more prevalent.

Le mar. 19 mars 2019 à 19:55, Karel Adams <fa348...@skynet.be> a écrit :

> For what it is worth (and I do not think much of that, myself!): the
> landuse tag is one of the most confusing and most misused.
>
> In my self-assigned job of mapping aerodromes, and improving on them, I
> often see tags like
>
> landuse=grass
>
> and that seems incorrect to me, it ought to be surface=grass rather
>
> Correct usage of landuse includes (in my very personal appreciation!)
> landuse=industrial, landuse=military, landuse=commercial,
> landuse=recreational and more such. What that means to the mapping of
> highways is beyond my comprehension; and, to be frank, beyond my interest.
> I only wanted to give my opinion on the general usage of the landuse= tag.
> Perhaps the best application of the landuse tag to highways - but also to
> railways, canals, aerodromes, &c, would be landuse=infrastructure or
> landuse=public_infrastructure
>
> NB wasn't there a dedicated mailing list about tagging?
>
> For what it is worth,
>
>
> On 19/03/2019 18:33, Stijn Rombauts via Talk-be wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> What are the opinions these days about landuse mapping: connect landuses
> to highways or let space between landuse polygons and adjacent highways?
> Is there a consensus or can everyone do whatever he/she likes?
> My opinion: I *hate* landuse connected to highways.
>
> Regards,
>
> StijnRR
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-be mailing 
> listTalk-be@openstreetmap.orghttps://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-be mailing list
> Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
>
_______________________________________________
Talk-be mailing list
Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be

Reply via email to