Lionel, merci!
"landcover=" est du nouveau pour moi, faut que je regarde dedans!
Bien chaleureusement,
On 19/03/2019 20:07, Lionel Giard wrote:
For what i understand, the landuse=grass is mostly a "landcover=grass"
tag which was never properly named (and thus it is used like that).
The surface=grass alone doesn't mean much in OSM as the surface tag is
(i think) only a secondary tag (adding information to other object
like highway=* ).
For the original question, it seems indeed to be less accepted to
connect the landuse to the highway! And i find that it is so much
easier to edit when it is not connected to the highway (or to the
landuse on the other side) as it can just be directly moved without
splitting first. If you want to map the area of an highway there is
the proposal of tag "area:highway=*" that can be used but is not
rendered at the moment (see here :
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Street_area).
But it could in the future if the usage become more prevalent.
Le mar. 19 mars 2019 à 19:55, Karel Adams <fa348...@skynet.be
<mailto:fa348...@skynet.be>> a écrit :
For what it is worth (and I do not think much of that, myself!):
the landuse tag is one of the most confusing and most misused.
In my self-assigned job of mapping aerodromes, and improving on
them, I often see tags like
landuse=grass
and that seems incorrect to me, it ought to be surface=grass rather
Correct usage of landuse includes (in my very personal
appreciation!) landuse=industrial, landuse=military,
landuse=commercial, landuse=recreational and more such. What that
means to the mapping of highways is beyond my comprehension; and,
to be frank, beyond my interest. I only wanted to give my opinion
on the general usage of the landuse= tag. Perhaps the best
application of the landuse tag to highways - but also to railways,
canals, aerodromes, &c, would be landuse=infrastructure or
landuse=public_infrastructure
NB wasn't there a dedicated mailing list about tagging?
For what it is worth,
On 19/03/2019 18:33, Stijn Rombauts via Talk-be wrote:
Hi,
What are the opinions these days about landuse mapping: connect
landuses to highways or let space between landuse polygons and
adjacent highways? Is there a consensus or can everyone do
whatever he/she likes?
My opinion: I *hate* landuse connected to highways.
Regards,
StijnRR
_______________________________________________
Talk-be mailing list
Talk-be@openstreetmap.org <mailto:Talk-be@openstreetmap.org>
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
_______________________________________________
Talk-be mailing list
Talk-be@openstreetmap.org <mailto:Talk-be@openstreetmap.org>
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
_______________________________________________
Talk-be mailing list
Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
_______________________________________________
Talk-be mailing list
Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
