Ok, thanks for the suggestion! No, unfortunately, there is nothing for Bruges.
Vucodil > ---------------------------------------- > From: Pieter Vander Vennet <pieterv...@posteo.net> > Sent: Sun Mar 08 13:56:34 CET 2020 > To: Vucodil via Talk-be <talk-be@openstreetmap.org> > Subject: Re: [OSM-talk-be] Cameras - sous-surveillance.net - Brussels > > > Hey Vucodil! > > This is awesome! > > I've skimmed your code and it looks pretty cool. > One remark: you set a few statusses, such as 'TO_DELETE'... One approach > could be to have some validation rules in JOSM which helps to prevent an > upload of unwanted camera's or statuses. Some examples of extra JOSM > rules can be found here: https://josm.openstreetmap.de/wiki/Rules > > PS: is there a dataset on Bruges as well? > > Kind regards and good luck with the project, > Pietervdvn > > On 05.03.20 22:36, Vucodil via Talk-be wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > > > Few months ago, I presented in Matrix the project of importing cameras of > > sous-surveillance.net in OSM : > > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Catalogue/sous-surveillance.net. > > Soon, I will upload a subset of those cameras (only Brussels). If you want > > to comment my workflow or to check an example of geojson output, be welcome. > > > > - Workflow: > > https://gitlab.com/vucodil/osm-import-sous-surveillance.net-brussels/-/blob/master/getCameraBxlToAdd.ipynb > > > > - Geojson example: > > https://gitlab.com/vucodil/osm-import-sous-surveillance.net-brussels/-/blob/master/example_camerasBxlToAdd.geojson, > > > > > > The full import may happen in the future if we get more permissions. > > > > Best regards, > > > > Vucodil > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Talk-be mailing list > > Talk-be@openstreetmap.org > > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be > > -- > Met vriendelijke groeten, > Pieter Vander Vennet > _______________________________________________ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
