I myself know only about 2 examples that can be classified as living_street, that is two residential streets classified as "calcadão" in the data source. That is a residential street where cars don't have access. In my opinion, if cars have access without any specific signs identifying as such, tag as residential.
Aun Johnsen Sent from my iPhone > On 18. sep. 2014, at 14.16, Andreas Schmidt <schmidt-postf...@freenet.de> > wrote: > > Good evening, > > while mapping in Itanhém (Bahia), I found all streets in the city, > except the main state street BA-290, tagged as living_street. > Those streets that were missing and I added today, have been tagged as > residental by me, resulting in a city with mixed sort of streets now: > http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=16/-17.1650/-40.3357 > > That's unusual for me and I want to ask, which is the usual way to tag > city streets in Brazil? > > Here in Germany, a living_street means: > * right of way for pedestrians, who may walk or play on the entire street > * maximum speed 7 km/h > * no parking except dedicated signs allow parking > > Most city streets (90-95%) in Europe are residental rather than > living_street. > How is it in Brazil? > > kind regards > Andreas > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-br mailing list > Talk-br@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-br _______________________________________________ Talk-br mailing list Talk-br@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-br
