I think I will also check where mountain peaks and survey points overlap and copy the elevation from the survey point over to the peak, then leave both in existence.
Adam On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 8:16 PM, Adam Dunn <dunna...@gmail.com> wrote: > I'm working through CanVec for my home area (092H04), and the pipeline > feature from the CanVec import uses the tags k=pipeline:type > v=natural_gas|oil, whereas the preferred OSM tag is to use k=type > v=natural_gas|oil [ > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dpipeline] > > Also, I've noticed that some of the CanVec data is out of position/date by > quite a bit. The downtown high-voltage transformer station was about 100 > meters out of where it should be, and the CanVec data still shows the old > building for Sardis Secondary School, which was demolished in 1995 and > replaced with a new building in a different location/shape. I feel > comfortable doing the CanVec import for my home town because I know the area > well enough to omit poor data, but I don't know if I should go ahead with > CanVec conversion for other areas. Most of the data is good, it's just the > few outdated points that are questionable. Should I go ahead with other > areas and just blindly import, or is it better to wait for local mappers? > > Adam >
_______________________________________________ Talk-ca mailing list Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
