OK... access=no, emergency=yes. I'll tag one like that and see what the routing software does after the next update.
Thanks... Sam -----Original Message----- From: Adam Dunn <dunna...@gmail.com> To: talk-ca <talk-ca@openstreetmap.org> Subject: Re: [Talk-ca] Routing errors, turn restrictions and median crossovers Date: Sat, 05 Mar 2011 20:46:00 -0800 Rather than turn restrictions, what about tagging the service way itself as <access=no,emergency=yes>, or something similar? There's also an abandoned tag for access=emergency [http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/emergency_vehicle_access]. Adam On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 8:00 PM, Samuel Longiaru <longi...@shaw.ca> wrote: > I'm getting a number of crazy routings that suggest doing U-turns via > emergency median crossovers. The crossovers are in the imports and they all > throw errors in regards to service roads connected to motorways. I guess > they could all get turn restrictions applicable to all but public service > vehicles but does existing routing software make the distinction as to > vehicle type anyway? Any suggestion as to how to treat these? We really > don't want these kinds of routes. > > Thanks, > > Sam L. > Kamloops > _______________________________________________ > Talk-ca mailing list > Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca > > _______________________________________________ Talk-ca mailing list Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
_______________________________________________ Talk-ca mailing list Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
