On 19-12-2011 20:38, john whelan wrote:
Yes because it is the individual contributor who has to accept the OSM's new licensing terms, the data was not imported directly from CANVEC into OSM.

As a Canadian tax payer I'm not quite certain I like the idea of OSM having the power to re-license Government data but that is a separate issue.

John,

Whether you like it or not, NRCan explicitly allows it, as long as they are attributed as the source:

/All distributed data should be accessed and used relatively to the GeoGratis Unrestricted Use Licence Agreement <http://geogratis.cgdi.gc.ca/geogratis/en/licence.jsp>. With this licence, users are granted a non-exclusive, fully paid, royalty-free right and licence to exercise all intellectual property rights in the data. This includes the right to use, incorporate, sublicense (with further right of sublicensing), modify, improve, further develop, and distribute the data; and to manufacture and/or distribute Derivative Products. The Licensee shall identify the source of the Data, in the following manner, where any of the Data are redistributed, or contained within Derivative Products: "© Department of Natural Resources Canada. All rights reserved."
/
See: http://geogratis.cgdi.gc.ca/geogratis/en/index.html

Furthermore, NRCan is even spending your tax dollars to facilitate incorporating their data into OSM.

Personally, as a former Canadian tax payer I can say that what NRCan does is one of the best ways of my tax dollars being spent :) It's too bad that the national mapping agency which is currently being funded by my tax euros takes a way less proactive stance towards open data. At least by decree of our Ministry of Economy, Agriculture and Innovation, a lot of geospatial and other data will be open in a few weeks :)

Every time when your government is doing something you don't like, are you going to share that with the world as well?

Frank

_______________________________________________
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca

Reply via email to