Interesting, I guess I'll keep the access=no tag until it is confirmed that the road is definitely closed. Then, I'll probably tag it as abandoned=yes (instead of disused) as I suspect it won't be maintained as it is considered dangerous.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:abandoned Someone has an idea on the best list to contact about this rendering problem? Thanks Daniel -----Original Message----- From: Harald Kliems [mailto:kli...@gmail.com] Sent: February-25-12 20:46 To: Daniel Begin Cc: infosbelas-...@yahoo.fr; talk-ca@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [Talk-ca] Re : Closed Road Tagging Hi Daniel, 2012/2/25 Daniel Begin <jfd...@hotmail.com>: > Le problème est qu'il n'y a pas de construction sur la route. J'utilise ce > tag seulement lorsqu'il s'agit d'un vrai chantier... For this reason, I still think that access=no is the cleanest solution, no matter what mapnik renders. The only alternative I can see is using the disused tag (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:disused ). The wiki does not mention highways, but if you look at the description I think it matches quite nicely with the problem at hand. And tagwatch says that there are some instances where people have used disused=* in combination with highway=*. But this most certainly won't solve your rendering issue and should probably be discussed on the tagging list. Harald. -- Please use encrypted communication whenever possible! Key-ID: 0x199DC50F _______________________________________________ Talk-ca mailing list Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
