I totaly agree with you ! This is CLEAR and completed with several exemple. And level 8 seems dedicaced to a PROVINCE (Ontario , British Colombia...ans so on) but NOT for cities (like Quebec city) So defibitively i suggest: A polygone with adminlevel=4 for PROVINCE of Quebec A SINGLE NODE widh adminkevel=8 for CITY of Quebec
Right? Bruno Remy Le 2012-06-14 14:35, "Pierre Béland" <infosbelas-...@yahoo.fr> a écrit : > Bruno, > > In the wiki page it is clearly indicated to use admin_level=8 for > municipalities in Canada. Levels 9 and 10 are used for subdivisions into > the municipality (ie. arrondissement and neighborhood / quartiers ). > > Pierre > > ------------------------------ > *De :* Bruno Remy <bremy.qc...@gmail.com> > *À :* talk-ca@openstreetmap.org > *Envoyé le :* Jeudi 14 juin 2012 13h44 > *Objet :* [Talk-ca] admin_level of canadian cities > > hi, > > What do you suggest for "admin_level" of canadian cities, because i > noticed difference between the official Canadian recommendation on > Openstreetmap wiki ( > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Admin_level#10_admin_level_values_for_specific_countries) > witch is suggesting LEVEL 8 ... whereas you can check LEVEL 4 for big > cities in Canada on Opensstreetmap (Quebec City as instance...) > > So ... do we adjust our admin_level according to the canadian section of > openstreetmap's wiki? > Or do you suggest to keep on tracks on LEVEL 8 usage... and why? > > -- > Bruno Remy > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-ca mailing list > Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca > > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-ca mailing list > Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca > >
_______________________________________________ Talk-ca mailing list Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
