Yes, I agree with you, and we will keep discussing through the ‘real’ OSM channels. I don’t expect people to sign up for Github. I see it more as a public way for us to track our mapping projects, so that everyone can see what’s going on and respond there if they choose to. I definitely don’t see it as the only / exclusive way to discuss.
Martijn > On Apr 26, 2017, at 10:49 AM, Michael Reichert <naka...@gmx.net> wrote: > > Hi Martijn, > > Am 26.04.2017 um 18:22 schrieb Stewart C. Russell: >> I know that Github issues are the industry standard, and the OSM >> comment/discussion mechanisms may seem a little quaint, but we risk >> talking past one another if we splinter the discussion. > > Just my 2 cent as a non-Canadian. I think you, Martijn, cannot expect an > average mapper to sign up for Github (a platform which belongs neither > to the OSMF nor to any local chapter) just to be able to complain about > someone else edits. There is already a plenty of platforms which can be > used to discuss things in the OSM universe, changeset discussion and > this mailing list are two of them. > > Best regards > > Michael > > -- > Per E-Mail kommuniziere ich bevorzugt GPG-verschlüsselt. (Mailinglisten > ausgenommen) > I prefer GPG encryption of emails. (does not apply on mailing lists) > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-ca mailing list > Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca _______________________________________________ Talk-ca mailing list Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca