Thanks for a good workflow - I cleared up 8 so far pretty quickly around Hope, BC. There's a bunch in a cluster around Merritt too. I'm guessing it's certain imports or import authors vs others that makes the difference.
alarobric On Sun, Jul 2, 2017 at 3:40 PM, Stewart C. Russell <scr...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 2017-07-02 04:41 PM, Begin Daniel wrote: > > > > However, since the same translator was used for all the polygons, the > > problem should also appear on water bodies, etc. The problem may have > > been related to the complexity of the polygons to convert. > > Hi Daniel - yes, I'm seeing a bunch of water relations with the same > problem, such as on the Grand River > <https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/576317> and also parts of the > Speed near Guelph. Some of these data were imported from Canvec 10. > > > I also found that JOSM had similar problems with tag transfers a few > > years ago (1). Maybe some of the problems found result from merging > > nearby wooded areas? > > > > Daniel > > > > (1) https://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/9832. > > Interesting, but I'm seeing a lot of the problem water relations > worldwide (well, Scotland and Germany) where JOSM wasn't involved. So > while the JOSM issue might have contributed a little, there were other > factors in play. Indeed, I've even seen changesets (such as 5735148 from > Sep 2010) where the editor had to duplicate the relation tag in the > outer way to get the inner features to render! > > cheers, > Stewart > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-ca mailing list > Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca >
_______________________________________________ Talk-ca mailing list Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca