And as a local chapter new comers could suggest/view tasks to work on. Kind
of like what we did for Fort Mac.

A centralized communication hub would enable us to move forward and
concentrate our efforts(small remote villages for example)

On Sep 28, 2017 12:12 PM, "Matthew Darwin" <matt...@mdarwin.ca> wrote:

> Hi Brian,
>
> In my view we definitely need OSMCanada to go beyond the big cities.  It
> is not "Canada" if we don't.
>
> In my view the main things that a collection of people cannot do on their
> own are:
>
> 1) Have a bank account.  There are groups that would give and organization
> money to do things around OSM. You can't just give money to an
> individual.   Also might need to look into charitable status later on so
> people could give donations and get a tax receipt (more paperwor overhead
> for that)
>
> 2) Look into getting money from the feds.  There have been announcements
> about Feds making money available for Smart Cities and related activities,
> for sure money cannot go to individuals.  I am waiting to see the details
> on what they are going to fund.
>
> Monies received could go towards meetups/hosting costs (which people pay
> out of their own pocket now) as well as "hiring" people to work on specific
> projects which normally they would not spend time on.... or maybe travel
> costs to go do a survey in an area which needs help, but has no expert
> mappers. or more training activities for folks. I could also see an
> educational component whereas it would be great to have people go into
> highschool civic classes and do a session on OSM.
>
> 3) The Building Canada 2020 project needs some leadership to make things
> happen.  Having an organization helping to drive that would make that
> easier.
>
> 4) There are things that some folks across the country have done to
> improve their area of the map... would be good to share practices more
> broadly, in a Canadian context.
>
> Of course all of these can be done in a private organization (eg like
> Mapbox), but I feel that building an organization to represent the broader
> community would be more beneficial in the long run.
>
> My 2c.
> On 2017-09-28 08:19 AM, Brian Bancroft wrote:
>
> Hi Matthew,
>
> It seems like an interesting idea. I've been travelling a bit lately, and
> I've found there's a lot of people out there who don't know about OSM where
> the platform is exactly what they need.
>
> Would a robust OSMCanada spread the Gospel beyond the cities? Would it
> seek to incorporate local GIS imports on the map with legal support and
> task management?
>
> Do we know what an incorporated OSMCanada would do that the informal
> association of really nice and diligent people can't do on their own?
>
> I won't be making SoTMUS this year, but I'd love to hear more about what
> your aims are with this venture, and the problems you and others believe
> (or know) it would solve through incorporation and (possibly?)  sweet
> government handouts. I'm guessing that these are the questions you want to
> crunch out while you're at the gathering of interesting people.
>
> Best wishes and good luck with this endeavour,
>
> Brian
>
>
>
>
> *From:* jwhelan0...@gmail.com
> *Sent:* September 28, 2017 7:06 AM
> *To:* scr...@gmail.com
> *Cc:* talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
> *Subject:* Re: [Talk-ca] OSM Canada & State of the Map US: Oct 20-22
>
> I hadn't heard of them and I'm in Ottawa but there again I'm not very
> sociable.  I question why such a decision would be made out of the country?
>
> Does it matter if someone creates a not for profit Canadian corporation? I
> think it would have to change its name though there have been discussions
> recently about the use of OSM in names.
>
> Cheerio John
>
> On 27 September 2017 at 21:59, Stewart C. Russell <scr...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On 2017-09-27 05:49 PM, Matthew Darwin wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > Are any Canadian folks going to State of the Map US October 20-22
>> > https://2017.stateofthemap.us/
>>
>> Nope. Wish I could afford it.
>>
>> > During the conference, I would like to have a discussion about turning
>> > the informal https://www.osmcanada.ca/ into a not-for-profit Canadian
>> > corporation.
>>
>> I'd be opposed. Who are osmcanada? They don't represent me. Last I heard
>> it was an informal group of mappers in Ottawa. What would the non-profit
>> do? How would it justify its status? Would it be attempting to be an
>> OSMF Chapter?
>>
>>  Stewart
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Talk-ca mailing list
>> Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-ca mailing 
> listTalk-ca@openstreetmap.orghttps://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-ca mailing list
> Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
>
>
_______________________________________________
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca

Reply via email to