Before Scruss comes out and says it: 1. Wiki documentation 2. You need to get LWG to approve license as it's not a standard license. Explicit permission can certainly help our case.
After license is approved we could move on to approval of data quality, then submit it for revue on import list(p.s. if it's crappy data they are going to tell you about how it's crappy) After all that(maybe 1-2 years later) can we move on to the serving of data via a tasking manager and start the import On Feb 28, 2018 11:54 AM, "john whelan" <jwhelan0...@gmail.com> wrote: > Similar to does not mean the same unless it is the TB Open Data license > but I suspect it predates that one. Given that Stats Canada has said it > will make the data available through the Federal Government's Open Data > portal real soon now I suspect that an email from the city even to yourself > would be acceptable. > > There is an import process speak nicely to James and he may be kind enough > to handhold you through it. > > The LWG will give an opinion on the license but it could take some > considerable time to do so. > > The import needs to be approved by a the local community. In Ottawa two > or three local mappers gathered together over coffee to approve it. I > think there were more than three. > > Given your suspected time frames its probably best to document the import > fairly quickly. That way it allows for those mappers who feel imports are > terrible to have their say. > > Cheerio John > > On 28 February 2018 at 10:31, keith hartley <keith.a.hart...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Hi OSM'ers >> >> I am working on adding buildings to OSM in Manitoba and have a few >> questions. I was just offered an updated building footprint and address >> shape file from the City of Brandon, and agreement that it can be used in >> OSM. I understand that the license needs to be compliant with the OSMs of >> course, and will email the licensing group. The City uses a open data >> license similar to Ottawa's (can be seen here >> http://opengov.brandon.ca/terms.aspx) I can get written consent in an >> email if need be as well. Currently the buildings are from the Manitoba >> land initiative website (MLI) and I can see that the city of Brandon Data >> is much more accurate (in both attributes and position) I will review the >> current data. Is there anything else I should be doing before I upload >> this? >> >> The plan is to have high school students look at the map and using >> walking maps or equivalent data capture (android app) to find what is >> accessible for people with mobility issues around their schools. I'll write >> the results on a wiki to show our successes. Anyone else have good ideas >> how to get students to add to the map? (with teacher oversight of course!) >> >> Cheers, >> Keith >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Talk-ca mailing list >> Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-ca mailing list > Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca > >
_______________________________________________ Talk-ca mailing list Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
