Just looking at the data for some random areas, it looks like the quality is comparable to hand-drawn buildings (but not as good as most municipal data). There are some weirdly rotated and sized buildings, as well as some missing buildings, there may be other problems in areas I haven't examined. A few comments: - The StatsCan data is of better quality, it should be used instead of the Microsoft data when possible. - Existing hand-drawn/imported buildings should not be replaced by the Microsoft data (except for CanVec buildings, maybe). - In any import, the bigger provinces should be split into smaller areas (counties or regions) DannyMcD
_______________________________________________ Talk-ca mailing list Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
