For me nodes, ways and areas sound reasonable for slipways.
A slipway is similar to a street => in osm a way.
It may be a very small feature and somebody may only know the estimated
location => in osm a node
It may be of very different width up to a wide area like => in osm a
polygon/closed way.
Small slipways often are some kind of street extending to the water, so
a way should fit perfectly.
regards
Peter
Am 21.06.2012 10:38, schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer:
2012/6/21 Peter Wendorff<wendo...@uni-paderborn.de>:
According to the wiki slipways are correct as a non-closed way, so this is
an error of the Navit converter.
this is not completely clear. The wiki page for the feature used to
define it for nodes only, then someone changed this to linear ways
only:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Tag%3Aleisure%3Dslipway&action=historysubmit&diff=595262&oldid=510283
someone else changed it back months later:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Tag%3Aleisure%3Dslipway&action=historysubmit&diff=711100&oldid=689606
and then ways were added again:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Tag%3Aleisure%3Dslipway&action=historysubmit&diff=727279&oldid=711100
The map-features still list only nodes as valid elements for slipways:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:leisure?uselang=en-US
Taginfo lists 7857 nodes and 1607 ways.
http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/leisure=slipway
Shall we add ways for this feature in the map features compilation?
cheers,
Martin
_______________________________________________
Talk-de mailing list
Talk-de@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de
_______________________________________________
Talk-de mailing list
Talk-de@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de
