Re-bonjour, J'ai reçu une réponse de l'utilisateur :
*Data comes from http://www.velib.paris.fr/service/carto . I have used an automated script to translate to osm type data. Could you give me guidelines to add data? I know personally about 30-40 stations, it's obviously impossible to know 1200 of them. I have them on my offline map so i'm not very affected if the list is not accepted in the map as it is.* * * *So what should I do now to improve things? The names can be fixed and I can eliminate the name for example:* * * *01005 - LES HALLES - SEBASTOPOL Les Halles - Sebastopol* * * *Would this be enough, or you would need even more changes?* * * *As far as I have seen the "many" stations on the map are much less than 1200, but usually they are more precise by a few meters. For my personal use the quantity is more important than meter level accuracy.* * * *Hope we'll get to a solution, Tudor Suciu* Ma réponse perso serait de lui confirmer qu'il est effectivement plus judicieux de travailler de manière déconnectée de OSM s'il privilégie la quantité de stations à la qualité de leur positionnement Le 31 octobre 2011 11:50, Ab_fab <gamma....@gmail.com> a écrit : > Changeset annulé par celui-ci > http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/9701680 > > Message envoyé par la suite > > Good morning, > (I use English in this message, as it is the language used in your > changesets descriptions) > > I have applied a revert on the following changeset > http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/9695553 > > It has been discussed this morning on the French mailing list, > It has been considered as a necessary action, based on the following > elements : > > _ Automatic imports are not forbidden. > BUT it is good and normal practice to prepare it thoroughly, and > especially communicate as much as possible via mailing list(s) and the > wiki. > Purpose is to make sure that the type of data and the way it is imported > is not harmfull to the existing elements > > _ Source of the data used for your import is not mentionned. > It is a very important information, which might allow the community to > assess the precision of the data. > Do you know how the location of the stations has been defined ? For > example, if the location comes from proprietary data or from data under > copyright (i.e. Gmaps), then it would be seen as a violation of copyright > that may have impact on the whole OSM data. > > _ Many Velib stations are already present in OSM database. > Are you confident that your data is more valuable ? > For example description of each station is given in "all capitals" type. > This is not common practice as it is not convenient for reading. > > If you consider that the data you have in hands has some added value, > please come and talk about it on the French mailing-list, where we may > discuss of the best way to integrate this additional data in a more > constructive way > > Kind regards > > > Le 31 octobre 2011 10:00, Pieren <pier...@gmail.com> a écrit : > > +1 évidemment. Sans compter le faible niveau de préparation, on ne >> connait rien des données sources et celles qu'on avait trouvé par le >> passé n'étaient pas libres... >> >> Pieren >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Talk-fr mailing list >> Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org >> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr >> > > > > -- > ab_fab <http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Ab_fab> > "Il n'y a pas de pas perdus" > -- ab_fab <http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Ab_fab> "Il n'y a pas de pas perdus"
_______________________________________________ Talk-fr mailing list Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr
