Hi, Ed Loach wrote:
> If I'd known > I could have just gone in and revised it to make everything that > much more logical and consistent I'd have done it already <bg>. Map Features is there to document what we have (and by implication to suggest that new things could be mapped in the same way if practical). So if you change what we have, or if you introduce something entirely new we didn't have before, then you should indeed amend Map Features. Just revising Map Features on a whim without also revising the data would, however, be counterproductive because, as I said, Map Features is there to document what we have (and not to say "I'd like you to do it this way in the future please"). If you intend to make a large-scale change to the data that's there, some advance discussion is in order and you should only proceed if there is widespread acceptance. This does not necessarily require writing a proposal on the Wiki. And widespread acceptance does not mean "I called for a vote and of the 8 people who participated, 7 were in favour". Bye Frederik -- Frederik Ramm ## eMail [EMAIL PROTECTED] ## N49°00'09" E008°23'33" _______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
