On 11 Aug 2009, at 08:31, Peter Miller wrote:

>
> On 11 Aug 2009, at 07:43, Shaun McDonald wrote:
>
>>
>> On 11 Aug 2009, at 06:41, Peter Miller wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On 10 Aug 2009, at 23:09, Bogus Zaba wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> With Denbighshire however I made a new relation (192442) and am  
>>>> slowly
>>>> adding various ways that will make up this boundary. Not sure  
>>>> however
>>>> how to edit the Denbighshire entry in the wiki to add the links  
>>>> to the
>>>> way and the various analysis tools (b a r j links). Can someone
>>>> point me
>>>> in the right direction to do this.
>>>
>>> Open the wiki in edit and you will see the format which is
>>> {{BrowseRelation|xxxxxx}} where xxxxxx is the boundary relation
>>> number. Do add these to the wiki for any boundaries that have been
>>> started but not yet finished.
>>
>> Why should boundaries that are not yet complete not be added to the  
>> wiki? Surely it would be better to have them there, just with the  
>> status marked as not complete. It also means that is someone is  
>> looking to continue the work of someone else then they can use that  
>> information in the wiki.
>
> I completely agree, and I think that is what I said!

Gah, I should re-read things before responding. For some reason I read  
it as Do not add these....

>
> To be clear, I suggest that we all boundaries, ones in progress and  
> ones that are complete to the wiki pages for England, Wales and  
> Scotland. Someone does however need to create the relevant section  
> on the Scotland page and list the administrative areas as well.

+1

Shaun


_______________________________________________
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

Reply via email to