The only reason I prefer a verified=yes rather than the tag deleted is that at least it tells me the stop is verified. If the tag is deleted it might be verified or might be that the tag was deleted.
Cheers Andy >-----Original Message----- >From: talk-gb-boun...@openstreetmap.org [mailto:talk-gb- >boun...@openstreetmap.org] On Behalf Of Christoph Boehme >Sent: 23 March 2010 1:21 PM >To: Tom Chance >Cc: Public transport/transit/shared taxi related topics; talk- >g...@openstreetmap.org >Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] XAPI lagging behind by days? > >Well, I just updated the Birmingham scheme two days ago to accept >naptan:verified=yes, because Andy asked for it. > >Perhaps it makes sense to reorganise the schemes to have only one basic >scheme which displays verification status, CUS and notes/errors and a >number of specialised schemes building on top of the basic one for >information that is not available everywhere like route references, >shelter information and asset references. > >Christoph > >On 23/03/2010 12:59, Tom Chance wrote: >> Oh, well, I don't mind really. I've just assumed that the tag should be >> deleted as the Birmingham scheme also shows them needing work. It is a >bit >> confusing having the three colour schemes when I'm aiming to fix the data >up >> to a canonical OSM standard. >> >> Tom >> >> >> On 23 March 2010 12:16, Christoph Boehme <christ...@b3e.net> wrote: >> >>> Tom, >>> >>> If you wish I can change the Hull scheme to mark stops with >>> naptan:verified=yes as completed as well. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Christoph >>> >>> On 23/03/2010 09:38, Tom Chance wrote: >>>> Hello there, >>>> >>>> I had a look at the NOVAM tool for bus stops to check my area: >>>> >>> http://mappa-mercia.org/novam/?scheme=hull&zoom=15&lat=51.46602&lon=- >0.07598&layers=BT >>>> >>>> I then updated a load of bus stops, most of which I just needed to >delete >>>> the 'naptan:verified' tag from: >>>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/4205203 >>>> >>>> But days later NOVAM still shows them as needing correcting, and if I >>>> download the area in XAPI lo-and-behold they seem unchanged: >>>> >>> http://xapi.openstreetmap.org/api/0.6/node[highway=bus_stop][bbox=- >0.08537,51.45112,-0.05885,51.4754] >>>> >>>> Isn't XAPI meant to only lag ten or so minutes behind the API? >>>> >>>> Tom >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Talk-GB mailing list >>>> Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org >>>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Talk-GB mailing list >>> Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org >>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb >>> >> >> >> > >_______________________________________________ >Talk-GB mailing list >Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org >http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb > >No virus found in this incoming message. >Checked by AVG - www.avg.com >Version: 9.0.791 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2762 - Release Date: 03/23/10 >19:33:00 _______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
