I support the main idea of the thread and the need for good sourcing... I think if the source tag is provided the verified=no tag is redundant? Isn't the source tag sufficient indication of the credibility of the way?
I've found the combination of StreetView and OS Locator can result in good named road coverage for 'armchair mapping'. I often end up with ways tagged: source=OS_OpenData_StreetView source:name=OS_OpenData_OSLocator Craig On 6 June 2010 12:40, Chris Hill <o...@raggedred.net> wrote: > Tim François wrote: >> If you are tracing from StreetView please, please, please properly >> source your ways: >> >> source=OS_OpenData_StreetView >> >> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Ordnance_Survey_Opendata#Attributing_OS >> >> Tim >> > +1 > > I'd go further, if you find something obviously traced from OS with no > source tag, please contact the author and gently remind them about > source tags - they might not subscribe to these lists. > > Cheers, Chris > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-GB mailing list > Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb > _______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
