Thank you all for your comments. I'll not get into the licence change debate here - plenty of that on osm-talk....
- I agree that there are a few surprises highlighted here. There are a couple of cycle tracks highlighted that I survryed myself, so I will have to check the underlying data. When I get home I will improve the filtering to exclude os 1:25k references. - I will see what I can do with the rendering as Gregory suggests. - The supermarkets reference is copy-and-paste-itis on my behalf - sorry! - Emilie is probably right that strictly I should be interested in history, but I cant do that easily from a planet extract, and I don't think it will matter too much with opendata being so recent. A curious legal point is that if a way was originally derived from os-opendata, but subsequently re-surveyed, is it still derived from opendata? Graham ____________________ Graham Jones (from my phone) On Jul 20, 2010 4:41 PM, "80n" <80n...@gmail.com> wrote: On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 10:02 AM, Robert Whittaker (OSM) < robert.whittaker+...@gmail.com <robert.whittaker%2b...@gmail.com>> wrote: > >... What's more, because Produced Works can be published under a restrictive license we couldn't get the additional data back by tracing either. ODbL + CT makes getting data back into OSM much harder than it is now by a massive degree. BTW, how would a corporation agree to the Contributor Terms anyway? The sign-up page only caters for individuals. Has, for example, CloudMade, agreed to the contributor terms yet and how could we tell if they had? 80n _______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
_______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
