I agree that it would be better that way. Emilie Laffray
On 12 Aug 2010 15:03, "Philip Stubbs" <phi...@stuphi.co.uk> wrote: > On 12 August 2010 14:23, Tim Francois <sk1pp...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: >> In that case, it sounds to me like a maintenance nightmare, especially if >> everyone adds all the errors they find in the OS data to the Catalog. >> I will certainly think before adding too many more errors to the Catalog, >> because there is every chance that in six months time (or whenever the next >> release cycle is for the particular product) the editor that added the data >> might be gone. It's tricky, because we obviously don't want to bombard OS >> with multiple emails with the same error (two or three won't hurt, and may >> actually be beneficial) - however, 'bombard' might be too strong-a word, >> depending on how many people actually pass on errors to OS... >> >> Tough call... >> Tim > > Would it better to collect all errors in the catalogue, and then > periodically send them to OS? I know that I would rather receive one > email with 100 actions than 100 emails with 1 action. Or worse, > multiple emails for the same action. > > It may also help improve the image of OSM by acting in a coordinated manner. > > > -- > Philip Stubbs > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-GB mailing list > Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
_______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
