The Vector Map District data includes some nice features like rocks and cliffs too (e.g http://maps.webhop.net/vmdmap/Hartlepool.png). I haven't tried to get these into OSM yet though - that is just a rendering of the OS data.
Graham. On 16 September 2010 16:15, Chris Hill <o...@raggedred.net> wrote: > Craig Loftus wrote: > >> Which is more accurate: the OS Streetview data that shows MHW (spring, I >>> assume) or the PGS data? >>> >>> >> >> I haven't used it for coast lines, but doesn't OS Vector District >> include the high water mark? This would be the most 'accurate', >> although not necessarily the most 'correct' source? Certainly better >> than tracing from Streetview. >> >> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Using_OS_Shapefiles >> >> > The OS data seems much better than the PGS data. > The OS vector data does seem to be older than the OS StreetView data, in > places that I have compared so in places where there is a lot of change, > such as rapid coastal erosion, tracing StreetView seems better. > > -- > Cheers, Chris > user: chillly > > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-GB mailing list > Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb > -- Dr. Graham Jones Hartlepool, UK email: grahamjones...@gmail.com
_______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
